Know a judgment is still good law — before you cite it
One overruled citation can sink a submission. Niyam maps how later courts have treated a case — followed, distinguished, referred, or overruled — so you check good law before opposing counsel, or the bench, does.
- Treatment history across the Supreme Court and High Courts
- Clear good-law, caution, and overruled signals at a glance
- When a case is overruled, see the authority that now governs
₹100 trial · 200 credits to start in under a minute
Trusted by advocates and in-house teams across India
Treatment mapped across India's courts
The shift
From hoping a case still holds to knowing it does
Stop relying on a precedent and finding out in court that it's been overruled. Verify treatment up front, so the first time you learn a case has moved is at your desk — not from the bench or the other side.
The old way
- Cite a case and hope no later bench has unsettled it
- Manually trace subsequent citations across reporters
- Miss the judgment that quietly distinguished yours
- Find out it's overruled only when the other side says so
With Niyam Citator
- See treatment at a glance before you rely on a case
- Subsequent citations traced for you across courts
- Catch a distinguishing or overruling judgment early
- Walk in knowing your authority still holds
Why Niyam Citator
Cite with confidence, not crossed fingers
The citator does the one check every citation needs and most research skips: is this case still good law today?
Treatment at a glance
See whether later courts followed, distinguished, referred to, or overruled a judgment — summarised so you grasp its standing in seconds. Instead of reading twenty later judgments to gauge whether a case still holds, you get the weight of that treatment up front, then drill into the ones that actually matter to your point.
Good-law / caution / overruled signals
Catch overrulings early
An overruled precedent flagged before you file is a submission saved. Niyam surfaces the judgment that unsettled yours and the one that now governs.
Overruling chains mapped for you
Across every court that matters
Treatment is traced across the Supreme Court and High Courts, so you weigh how binding and persuasive authority has moved. A proposition followed by one High Court but doubted by another is exactly the kind of split you need to know before you argue it — and the citator surfaces it instead of letting it hide in a reporter you didn't open.
Supreme Court & High Court coverage
Straight to the source
Every signal links to the judgment that set it. Read the later case yourself and confirm the treatment before you rely on it.
One click from signal to judgment
Built into research
Good-law signals ride alongside every cited answer in Niyam Research, so the check happens where you already work — not in a separate tool.
Citator signals inside every answer
Defensible by design
Niyam shows treatment from the real judgments, never a guess, so the standing you report is something you can stand behind.
Grounded in real subsequent judgments
Treatment history
See how every later court treated the case
A judgment's authority is written by the judgments that came after it. Niyam gathers that treatment — followed, distinguished, referred, overruled — into one view so you understand exactly where a precedent stands today.
- Followed, distinguished, referred, and overruled, summarised
- Counts of later judgments in each category
- Sorted so the decisive treatment surfaces first
Overruled alerts
Never build on law that's moved on
When a case has been overruled or doubted, the citator says so plainly — and points you to the authority that now governs. The catch happens at your desk, not across the courtroom.
- Clear stop signal on overruled or doubted precedent
- Linked to the judgment that unsettled it
- Pointed to the case that now states the law
Inside research
The good-law check, where you already work
You shouldn't have to leave your answer to verify it. Niyam shows good-law signals on every cited case inside Research, so checking standing is part of reading the answer — not a separate chore.
- Signals appear beside every cited judgment
- No switching tools to confirm a case still holds
- Verify, then draft or save — without losing your place
Citation context
See the full web of authority around a case
A judgment never stands alone. Niyam shows what a case relied on and which later cases rely on it, so you can trace the line of authority forward and backward. That context tells you whether you're citing a settled, much-followed proposition or a lone decision that later benches have quietly worked around — and points you to the leading case the chain keeps returning to.
- What the judgment cited, and what now cites it
- Trace the line of authority forward and backward
- Spot the leading case the chain keeps returning to
How it works
Verify a precedent in three steps
From a case to its standing today, without tracing citations by hand.
Open the judgment
Pull up a case from a Niyam answer or by searching for it. The citator view loads with it.
Read the treatment
See how later courts treated it — followed, distinguished, referred, or overruled — with the signal that matters surfaced first.
Cite with confidence
Confirm it's still good law, follow the link to any overruling authority, and rely on the case knowing where it stands.
- Signals on cited precedent
- Good-law
- Distinguished · referred · overruled
- Followed
- To verify a case still holds
- Seconds
- Overruled citations that slip through
- 0
Built for trust
Treatment from real judgments, never a guess
The standing the citator reports comes from the actual later judgments that cite a case — so it's something you can defend, not an estimate.
SC + HC
treatment traced across courts
Good-law
signals on every cited case
Linked
every signal opens its source judgment
Private
your work product is never used to train public models
Niyam maps treatment from the real subsequent judgments that cite a case, and every signal links to the judgment that set it — so you can read the later case and confirm the standing yourself. Nothing here is guessed, and your work stays private to your account, never used to train public models.
How it compares
Why a good-law check beats a confident chatbot
A general AI won't tell you a case has been overruled — it doesn't know. Manual citation-tracing works but eats your afternoon. Niyam does it in seconds, from real judgments.
| Capability | Niyam | Generic AI chatbot | Manual research |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tells you if a case is overruled | Yes | No | Manual |
| Traces subsequent citations | Automatically | No | By hand |
| Points to the governing authority | Yes | Rarely | Manual |
| Grounded in real judgments | Yes | Often invented | Yes |
| Speed to verify | Seconds | Seconds (unreliable) | Hours |
| Built into your research | Yes | No | Separate |
FAQ
Questions, answered straight
Where Niyam helps — and where your professional judgment stays in charge.
Whether a judgment is still good law — by mapping how later courts have treated it. Niyam shows whether subsequent judgments followed, distinguished, referred to, or overruled the case, so you know its standing before you rely on it.
From the real subsequent judgments that cite a case, across the Supreme Court and High Courts. Every signal links to the judgment that set it, so you can open the later case and confirm the treatment yourself rather than taking it on faith.
The citator flags it clearly and points you to the authority that now governs the point. You see both the overruling judgment and the case that states the current law, so you can re-cite to law that still holds.
No. Good-law signals appear alongside every cited case inside Niyam Research, so the check happens where you already work. You can also open a judgment directly to see its full treatment view.
No. The citator is a research tool that reports how courts have treated a precedent. It does not replace an advocate's judgment — you remain responsible for reading the authorities and deciding how to rely on them.
Treatment is traced across the Supreme Court and High Courts, and coverage keeps expanding alongside Niyam's growing corpus of more than 72,000 judgments.
A digest tells you what a case decided; the citator tells you whether that decision still stands. It reads the later judgments that cite a case and surfaces how they treated it — followed, distinguished, or overruled — rather than leaving you to trace that history reporter by reporter. And because every signal links to the judgment behind it, you can confirm the treatment yourself instead of trusting an editor's note.
No — and it isn't built to be relied on that way. The citator surfaces how later courts treated a case and points you straight to those judgments, so you spend your time reading the ones that matter instead of hunting for them. The signal tells you where to look; your own reading of the later judgment is what you rely on. Every signal links to its source for exactly that reason.
Because a single overruled citation can undo an otherwise sound submission — and the side that catches it first controls the argument. Courts and opposing counsel will check whether your authority still holds; the citator lets you check first, at your desk, so you either rely on the case with confidence or re-cite to the law that now governs before it ever becomes a problem in the room.
Check good law before you cite — not after the bench does.
Create your Niyam account in under a minute — ₹100 to start, 200 credits to try everything. Verify your next precedent's standing in seconds.
₹100 trial · 200 credits to start · cancel anytime