Petition and argue writs on constitutional authority you can defend
Writ practice turns on the Article, the fundamental right, and the precedent that controls. Niyam reads the Constitution of India — writ jurisdiction under Articles 32 and 226 and the fundamental-rights chapter — and the judgments construing them, and answers in plain English, every point cited to the Article or judgment it came from.
- Article 32 and 226 jurisdiction and maintainability authority, cited
- Fundamental-rights and judicial-review precedent grounded in the Constitution
- Good-law signals so an overruled precedent never reaches your petition
₹100 trial · 200 credits to start in under a minute
Trusted by advocates and in-house teams across India
Grounded in India's constitutional sources
The shift
From tracing the doctrine to arguing the Article in hand
Constitutional work rewards getting the jurisdiction and the right doctrine right, then finding the precedent that controls. Niyam compresses the search without cutting the citation.
The old way
- Tracing a constitutional doctrine across decades of judgments by hand
- Keyword search that misses the maintainability ruling phrased differently
- Copying citations and fearing one's been distinguished or overruled
- A general chatbot that invents a confident but non-existent ruling
With Niyam for Constitutional & Writ
- Ask in plain English; get the controlling Article and judgment in seconds
- Maintainability and jurisdiction grounded in Articles 32 and 226
- Every proposition cited to the Article or judgment, good-law checked
- Grounded only in real Indian constitutional sources, never fabricated
Why Niyam for Constitutional & Writ
Doctrine at your fingertips, authority before the bench
Writ practice is decided on jurisdiction and on the controlling constitutional precedent. Niyam gives you both — the doctrine fast, and the authority you can defend before a Division Bench.
Article 32 and 226 jurisdiction
Trace the scope of writ jurisdiction before the Supreme Court under Article 32 and the High Courts under Article 226, with the judgments that map their reach.
Article 32 & 226 jurisdiction precedent
The five writs, on point
Find the authority on habeas corpus, mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, and quo warranto, grounded in the constitutional text and the case law.
Writ-specific precedent across courts
Fundamental-rights doctrine
Surface the controlling precedent on Articles 14, 19, and 21 and the doctrines the courts apply — reasonableness, proportionality, and the basic structure — each linked to the judgment.
Fundamental-rights precedent grounded in Part III
Never cite overruled law
Before you build a petition or appeal on a precedent, Niyam shows whether later courts followed, distinguished, or overruled it — so you argue from good law.
Good-law signals on every cited case
Maintainability and alternative remedy
Trace objections on maintainability, delay, and the availability of an alternative remedy to the authority that governs whether a writ will lie.
Maintainability precedent on point
Judicial review of action
Find the authority on judicial review of administrative and legislative action, grounded in the constitutional standards the courts apply.
Judicial-review precedent across the corpus
Plain-English answers
Ask the constitutional question you actually have
Type the question the way you'd put it to a senior — 'will a writ under Article 226 lie where an alternative statutory remedy exists?' Niyam reads the constitutional text and the governing judgments and answers in plain English, the controlling authority shown alongside.
- Understands the legal issue, not just the keywords
- Answers grounded in the Article and judgments that govern it
- Citations sit beside the answer, one click from the source
Open every source
Citations you can open and check
Every proposition carries its authority. Open the cited Article or judgment, read the exact paragraph, and confirm it says what Niyam says — because in a writ petition the source is the argument.
- Pinpoint citations to the Article or paragraph
- Jump straight from the answer to the primary source
- Nothing to take on faith — verify before you rely
Good-law signals
Know a constitutional precedent is safe before you rely on it
Niyam surfaces how later courts have treated a judgment — followed, distinguished, referred, or overruled — so an overruled citation never reaches your writ petition or appeal. When the law has moved on, it points you to the authority that now governs.
- Treatment history across Supreme Court and High Courts
- Clear good-law / caution / overruled signals at a glance
- Jump from the signal to the judgment that set it
Whole-corpus search
Search 72,000+ judgments and the constitutional text
Behind every answer is the full corpus — the Constitution of India and the judgments construing Articles 32, 226, and the fundamental-rights chapter — indexed so the case on point surfaces even when it's phrased differently from your query.
- Jurisdiction, maintainability, fundamental-rights, and review authority
- Finds the judgment on point even when the wording differs
- Filter by court and read the binding authority first
How it works
From a constitutional issue to cited authority in three steps
Niyam compresses the research loop without ever cutting the citation.
Ask in plain English
Describe the right, the action challenged, and the jurisdiction the way you'd brief a senior. Niyam reads the constitutional text and the governing judgments to understand exactly what controls.
Get a cited answer
Every answer comes grounded in primary sources — Articles and judgments — with citations you can open and verify yourself.
Verify and act
Read the source, confirm it's still good law, then draft the writ petition or grounds of appeal from it — without leaving Niyam.
- Indian judgments indexed
- 72,000+
- Writ jurisdiction covered
- Articles 32 & 226
- Cited to primary sources
- Every answer
- Signals on cited precedent
- Good-law
Built for trust
In a writ petition, the constitutional authority has to be real
A confident answer you can't defend collapses the moment the bench checks the citation. Niyam for Constitutional & Writ is engineered so every point traces back to a real Article or judgment you can open.
72,000+
Supreme Court & High Court judgments indexed
100%
of answers cited to primary sources
Good-law
treatment signals on cited precedent
Private
your matters are never sold or used to train public models
Niyam retrieves from real Indian constitutional sources rather than guessing, so it doesn't invent cases — and every answer links back to the Article of the Constitution or the judgment it relied on. Constitutional doctrine moves across benches and decades, so good-law signals matter most here: you see at a glance whether a precedent has been followed, referred to a larger bench, or overruled before you stake a petition on it. Your matters and queries stay private to your account, never sold and never used to train public models. The authority you take into a writ court actually exists, and the source is always one click away.
How it compares
Why constitutional lawyers research with Niyam, not a generic chatbot
A general AI can sound confident and still invent a landmark case. Manual research is reliable but slow when doctrine spans decades. Niyam gives you both speed and authority.
| Capability | Niyam | Generic AI chatbot | Manual research |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grounded in the Constitution | Articles & judgments | Generic / global | Yes, but slow |
| Article 32 / 226 jurisdiction | Yes — with maintainability | Unreliable | Manual |
| Every answer cited | Yes, to primary sources | Often uncited | Manual |
| Checks if a case is good law | Yes | No | Manual |
| Risk of invented cases | None — retrieval-grounded | High | None |
| Speed across decades of doctrine | Seconds | Seconds (unreliable) | Hours |
FAQ
Questions, answered straight
Where Niyam helps — and where your professional judgment stays in charge.
Niyam is grounded in the Constitution of India — writ jurisdiction under Articles 32 and 226 and the fundamental-rights chapter in Part III — together with the judgments of the Supreme Court and High Courts that construe them. You can move from a right or an action challenged to the Article and the precedent that governs it.
Yes. Niyam surfaces the authority on the scope of writ jurisdiction under Articles 32 and 226 and on objections such as alternative remedy, delay, and laches — each linked to the source so you argue maintainability from the holding, not a headnote.
Yes. Niyam surfaces a judgment's treatment history — whether later courts have followed, distinguished, referred to a larger bench, or overruled it — so you can see at a glance whether a constitutional authority is safe to cite. When a judgment has been overruled, it points you to the authority that now governs.
Yes. Describe the right and the issue in plain English and Niyam finds the authority by the legal question, not just the keywords — so it surfaces the fundamental-rights or judicial-review case on point even when it is phrased differently from how you searched. You then open the judgment and confirm it.
No. Niyam provides legal information and research grounded in primary sources. It does not create an advocate–client relationship and does not replace advice from a qualified advocate. You remain responsible for verifying every citation, confirming the current state of constitutional doctrine, and exercising professional judgment.
Judgments of the Supreme Court and High Courts, plus the constitutional text — writ jurisdiction under Articles 32 and 226 and the fundamental-rights chapter. Coverage keeps expanding; the corpus already runs to more than 72,000 judgments alongside the statute book.
Yes. Your queries and saved research stay private to your account. Niyam is built for the confidentiality constitutional work demands — your work product is never sold and never used to train public models.
Research constitutional and writ law on the Articles — cited and good-law checked.
Create your Niyam account in under a minute — ₹100 to start, 200 credits to try everything. Ask your first writ or fundamental-rights question and see the authority behind every answer.
₹100 trial · 200 credits to start · cancel anytime