Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Supreme Court of India · 2026-05-12

Padam Mehta vs The State Of Rajasthan

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Padam Mehta
Respondent
The State Of Rajasthan
Author
Vikram Nath
Bench
Vikram Nath

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized the constitutional significance of language as an essential medium for comprehension and meaningful participation in society. The Court recognized that the ability to understand and be understood in one's own language is a fundamental existential right, integral to individual identity and expression. The judgment underscored that accessibility to language is not merely a convenience but a constitutional imperative. The case arose from an appeal challenging a High Court order related to language rights, highlighting the importance of linguistic accessibility under the Constitution. The Court granted leave to appeal and proceeded to examine the constitutional dimensions of language rights.

Padam Mehta vs The State Of Rajasthan · Niyam