Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Supreme Court of India · 2026-03-13

Rajendra vs State Of Uttarakhand

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rajendra
Respondent
State Of Uttarakhand
Author
Dipankar Datta
Bench
Pankaj Mithal, Dipankar Datta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the appeal against the conviction of the appellants under Sections 376(2)(G) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for a serious criminal offence involving sexual assault and criminal intimidation. The Court reviewed the evidence and procedural aspects upheld by the High Court and the Trial Court. After considering the facts and legal provisions, the Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants. The judgment reinforces the strict application of criminal law provisions in cases of sexual offences and threats to ensure justice and deterrence.

Rajendra vs State Of Uttarakhand · Niyam