Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Supreme Court of India · 2026-01-08

Sumit Bansal vs M/S Mgi Developers And Promoters

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sumit Bansal
Respondent
M/S Mgi Developers And Promoters
Author
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Bench
Prashant Kumar Mishra, Sanjay Karol

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from the quashing of complaints filed under Section 138 read with Sections 141 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by the High Court of Delhi under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The key issue was the maintainability and sufficiency of the complaints related to dishonor of cheques and the applicability of Sections 141 and 142 in conjunction with Section 138. The Court analyzed the scope of Section 482 Cr.P.C. in quashing criminal complaints and emphasized the need for a prima facie case before interference. The appeals were adjudicated to clarify the procedural and substantive requirements for prosecution under the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Sumit Bansal vs M/S Mgi Developers And Promoters · Niyam