Rohit Jangde vs State Of Chhattisgarh

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the conviction of the accused based on circumstantial evidence, including last seen theory, recovery of remains, and DNA matching. The Court noted the deficiencies in the investigation and the reliance on conjectures, emphasizing the importance of establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The Court scrutinized whether the circumstantial evidence was sufficient and legally admissible to uphold the conviction. Ultimately, the Court highlighted the need for a thorough and fair investigation to ensure justice, and it scrutinized the evidentiary basis of the conviction.