Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Supreme Court of India · 2026-02-06

V. Pathmavathi vs Bharthi Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
V. Pathmavathi
Respondent
Bharthi Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd
Author
Dipankar Datta
Bench
Dipankar Datta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined an appeal against a High Court judgment that modified an award under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, in a claim for compensation following a fatal road accident caused by rash driving. The Court analyzed whether the High Court's modification was justified and upheld the principles of awarding compensation in motor accident claims. The judgment reaffirmed the importance of fair compensation for victims and clarified the scope of appellate review in such cases.

V. Pathmavathi vs Bharthi Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd · Niyam