Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Supreme Court of India · 2026-02-03

C. Velusamy vs K Indhera

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
C. Velusamy
Respondent
K Indhera
Author
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Bench
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the procedural timelines applicable to arbitral proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1990, specifically focusing on the periods stipulated in the 1940 and 1996 Acts. The court analyzed whether the timelines prescribed were mandatory or directory and their impact on the validity of arbitral awards. The judgment clarified the scope of judicial intervention in arbitration timelines, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory provisions to ensure the enforceability of arbitral awards. The court ultimately upheld the procedural requirements, reinforcing the importance of timely arbitration processes.

C. Velusamy vs K Indhera · Niyam