Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Supreme Court of India · 2026-04-02

Punjab And Sind Bank vs Raj Kumar

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Punjab And Sind Bank
Respondent
Raj Kumar
Author
Dipankar Datta
Bench
Dipankar Datta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined whether the modification of a disciplinary punishment from dismissal to compulsory retirement, based on allegations of discrimination, violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court emphasized the importance of scrutinizing trust and the proportionality of disciplinary actions. It upheld the High Court's decision to modify the punishment, affirming the principle of non-discrimination in employment disciplinary proceedings. The case underscores the Court's role in ensuring fairness and equality in administrative and disciplinary measures.

Punjab And Sind Bank vs Raj Kumar · Niyam