Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-09-12

Vaneeta Patnaik vs Nirmal Kanti Chakrabarti

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vaneeta Patnaik
Respondent
Nirmal Kanti Chakrabarti
Author
Pankaj Mithal
Bench
Pankaj Mithal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined whether the rejection of a sexual harassment complaint by the Local Complaint Committee was justified due to being filed beyond the prescribed limitation period. The court analyzed the statutory provisions related to the limitation period for filing such complaints and upheld the rejection, emphasizing the importance of timely filing. The judgment underscores the necessity of adhering to procedural timelines in sexual harassment cases under the relevant laws. The court's decision reinforces the procedural safeguards for respondents while balancing the rights of complainants.

Vaneeta Patnaik vs Nirmal Kanti Chakrabarti · Niyam