Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-09-15

Assistant General Manager State Bank Of ... vs Tanya Energy Enterprises Through Its ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Assistant General Manager State Bank Of ...
Respondent
Tanya Energy Enterprises Through Its ...
Author
Dipankar Datta
Bench
Dipankar Datta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the High Court's decision to quash a recovery proceeding initiated by a secured creditor under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The Court emphasized the importance of following statutory procedures and upheld the creditor's right to enforce security interests. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the borrower’s default and the creditor's actions were within legal bounds. The judgment reinforces the procedural safeguards available to secured creditors under the law.

Assistant General Manager State Bank Of ... vs Tanya Energy Enterprises Through Its ... · Niyam