Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-10-08

M/S Anvita Auto Tech Works Pvt. Ltd vs M/S Aroush Motors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S Anvita Auto Tech Works Pvt. Ltd
Respondent
M/S Aroush Motors
Author
Aravind Kumar
Bench
Aravind Kumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized that procedural law should facilitate justice rather than hinder it, advocating for a liberal approach when procedural rigidity causes injustice. The court highlighted that technicalities should not override substantive justice and that courts must ensure fair opportunities for litigants to defend their cases. The case involved challenging a High Court judgment, with the Supreme Court underscoring the importance of balancing procedural rules with substantive fairness. The judgment advocates a flexible approach to procedural adherence to serve the cause of justice.

M/S Anvita Auto Tech Works Pvt. Ltd vs M/S Aroush Motors · Niyam