Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-05-06

Tahir V. Isani vs Madan Waman Chodankar, (Since ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Tahir V. Isani
Respondent
Madan Waman Chodankar, (Since ...
Author
Vikram Nath
Bench
Vikram Nath

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of a High Court order that discontinued a civil enquiry under Order XXI Rules 97 and 101 of the CPC, relying on Order XXI Rule 102. The case involved property rights and procedural aspects of execution proceedings. The Court analyzed whether the High Court's reliance on Rule 102 was justified in setting aside the earlier order and allowing the application for discontinuance. The judgment clarified the scope of Order XXI Rules and procedural correctness in civil execution cases.

Tahir V. Isani vs Madan Waman Chodankar, (Since ... · Niyam