Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-05-01

Raju @ Umakant vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Raju @ Umakant
Respondent
The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Author
Sanjay Karol
Bench
Sanjay Karol

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the conviction and sentencing of an appellant under various sections of the IPC and the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, upheld by the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The case involved allegations of offences including kidnapping, rape, and atrocities against Scheduled Castes and Tribes. The Court confirmed the conviction and sentences, emphasizing adherence to procedural and substantive legal standards in cases of atrocities and sexual offences. The judgment reinforces the strict legal stance against offences under the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act.

Raju @ Umakant vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh · Niyam