Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-05-30

Chetan vs State Of Karnataka

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Chetan
Respondent
State Of Karnataka
Author
Surya Kant
Bench
Surya Kant

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 304 of the IPC, as well as Sections 3 and 5 of the Arms Act, based on circumstantial evidence including last seen theory, forensic evidence, and the appellant's abscondence. The courts below had found sufficient evidence to support the conviction, and the Supreme Court emphasized cautious review of concurrent findings. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower courts' judgments and emphasizing the importance of circumstantial evidence in criminal conviction.

Chetan vs State Of Karnataka · Niyam