Greater Mohali Area Development ... vs Anupam Garg Etc

The Supreme Court examined the validity of a consumer dispute redressal order involving the Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) and respondents seeking refunds and damages. The Court analyzed whether the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order to refund deposits with interest and additional costs was justified under consumer protection laws. The Court upheld the order, emphasizing the importance of protecting consumer rights and ensuring fair redressal in housing schemes. The judgment reinforces the authority of consumer forums to grant such relief in cases of non-compliance by developers or authorities.