Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-07-18

Bgm And M-Rpl-Jmct(Jv) vs Eastern Coalfields Limited

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bgm And M-Rpl-Jmct(Jv)
Respondent
Eastern Coalfields Limited
Author
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Bench
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined whether an arbitration agreement existed between the parties based on Clause 13 of the General Terms and Conditions in their contract. The High Court had dismissed the appellant's application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, on the grounds that no arbitration agreement was present. The Supreme Court considered the contractual clause and the nature of dispute resolution mechanisms, ultimately emphasizing the importance of clear arbitration agreements for arbitration proceedings. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming the absence of an arbitration agreement and dismissing the appeal.

Bgm And M-Rpl-Jmct(Jv) vs Eastern Coalfields Limited · Niyam