Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-07-16

Shiv Baran vs State Of U.P

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shiv Baran
Respondent
State Of U.P
Author
Sanjay Karol
Bench
Sanjay Karol, Prashant Kumar Mishra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of quashing summons issued under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, in a case involving multiple FIRs and allegations of assault and murder. The Court emphasized the importance of the trial court's discretion in summoning an accused under Section 319, ensuring that there is sufficient prima facie evidence to justify the summons. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the summons, affirming that the material on record did not warrant summoning the respondent. The judgment clarifies the scope of judicial review in proceedings under Section 319 and underscores the necessity of a prima facie case for summoning an accused.

Shiv Baran vs State Of U.P · Niyam