Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-07-22

Esakkimuthu vs State Represented By The Inspector Of ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Esakkimuthu
Respondent
State Represented By The Inspector Of ...
Author
Vikram Nath
Bench
Vikram Nath

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals against a conviction under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, upheld by the Madras High Court. The case involved two accused persons, Pitchu Mani and Esakkimuthu, with the lower courts confirming their sentences. The Court examined the evidence and legal validity of the conviction, ultimately affirming the lower courts' decisions. The judgment reinforces the principles of criminal liability under the IPC and the appellate process in criminal cases.

Esakkimuthu vs State Represented By The Inspector Of ... · Niyam