Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-01-06

Edakkandi Dineshan@ P.Dineshan vs State Of Kerala

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Edakkandi Dineshan@ P.Dineshan
Respondent
State Of Kerala
Author
Sudhanshu Dhulia
Bench
Sudhanshu Dhulia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the acquittal and conviction of accused persons under various sections of the IPC and the Explosive Substances Act, in a case arising from violence during a hartal called by RSS/VHP. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to acquit some accused and convict others, emphasizing the importance of evidence and the legal standards for conviction under Sections 302 and 149 of IPC, as well as Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act. The judgment underscores the necessity of establishing direct involvement and intent for criminal liability in cases of violence and explosive offences.

Edakkandi Dineshan@ P.Dineshan vs State Of Kerala · Niyam