Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-01-28

Gambhir Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Gambhir Singh
Respondent
The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Author
Vikram Nath
Bench
Sanjay Karol, Vikram Nath

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court reaffirmed the principle that in criminal cases, the prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, especially in cases based on circumstantial evidence. The Court emphasized that all circumstances relied upon must be fully established and proven, not merely possible or probable. The judgment references the landmark case of Sharad Birdhichand Sharda to outline the essential conditions for establishing guilt through circumstantial evidence. The Court underscored the importance of a complete and convincing chain of circumstances to uphold a conviction.

Gambhir Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh · Niyam