Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-01-21

The State Of Jharkhand vs Nishkant Dubey

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Jharkhand
Respondent
Nishkant Dubey
Author
Dipankar Datta
Bench
Dipankar Datta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined whether the quashing of an FIR by the High Court on the grounds of mala fides was justified. The High Court had held that continuing proceedings would amount to abuse of law, leading to the quashing of the FIR under Sections 336, 447, 448 IPC and Sections 10 and 11A of the Aircraft Act. The Supreme Court analyzed the legal validity of the High Court's decision and the principles governing the quashing of FIRs on grounds of mala fides and abuse of process.

The State Of Jharkhand vs Nishkant Dubey · Niyam