Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-02-25

Arvind Kumar Bhati vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Arvind Kumar Bhati
Respondent
The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Author
Sanjay Kumar
Bench
Sanjay Kumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the scope of High Court's powers in issuing directions in PIL cases, emphasizing that certain directions related to policy matters and day-to-day administration do not fall within the High Court's writ jurisdiction. The Court held that the directions issued by the High Court in this case exceeded its constitutional powers, as they involved policy decisions rather than legal or constitutional violations. The Court clarified the limits of judicial intervention in administrative and policy issues, reaffirming the principle that courts should not interfere in matters of policy unless there is a clear violation of constitutional rights.

Arvind Kumar Bhati vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh · Niyam