Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-12-18

Ranjeet Baburao Nimbalkar vs State Of Maharashtra

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ranjeet Baburao Nimbalkar
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Author
Aravind Kumar
Bench
Aravind Kumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of an administrative notification by the Bombay High Court, which designated Kolhapur as a seat for judicial sittings under the powers conferred by Section 51(3) of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956. The petitioner challenged this notification under Article 32 of the Constitution, arguing procedural or substantive irregularities. The Court analyzed the statutory provisions and the administrative necessity, ultimately upholding the High Court's authority to designate additional seats for effective judicial administration.

Ranjeet Baburao Nimbalkar vs State Of Maharashtra · Niyam