Bharat Mittal vs State Of Rajasthan

The Supreme Court examined whether, in cases where a director of a company is convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, but the company itself is not convicted due to legal issues like winding up or liquidation, the appellate court can impose a condition of depositing 20% of the amount under Section 148 of the Act. The court analyzed the legal provisions and the implications of such conditions in the context of ongoing litigations under Section 138. The judgment clarifies the scope of appellate powers in such scenarios, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach considering the legal complexities involved.