Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-08-12

A. Karunanithi vs The State Represented By Inspector Of ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
A. Karunanithi
Respondent
The State Represented By Inspector Of ...
Author
Pankaj Mithal
Bench
Pankaj Mithal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, where the Special Court convicted the appellants under Sections 13 and 7 of the Act. The Court analyzed whether the procedural and substantive aspects of the conviction adhered to legal standards. The Court upheld the conviction and the sentences imposed, emphasizing the importance of adherence to statutory provisions in corruption cases.

A. Karunanithi vs The State Represented By Inspector Of ... · Niyam