Kamal Gupta vs M/S L.R. Builders Pvt. Ltd

The Supreme Court examined two key issues: whether a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement can participate in arbitration proceedings, and whether courts can issue further directions after appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court clarified the legal position, emphasizing the importance of the arbitration agreement's scope and the court's limited jurisdiction post-appointment. The judgment provides guidance on the procedural aspects of arbitration and the role of courts in ancillary matters. The court upheld the principles of arbitration law, ensuring procedural fairness and judicial oversight.