Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-08-21

K.Pounammal vs State Represented By Inspector Of ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
K.Pounammal
Respondent
State Represented By Inspector Of ...
Author
Aravind Kumar
Bench
Aravind Kumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant, an Inspector of Central Excise, under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d). The appellate court confirmed the sentence of rigorous imprisonment and fines. The Court examined the evidence and found sufficient grounds to sustain the conviction, emphasizing the importance of integrity in public service. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' judgments.

K.Pounammal vs State Represented By Inspector Of ... · Niyam