Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-08-11

Arshnoor Kaur vs Union Of India

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Arshnoor Kaur
Respondent
Union Of India
Author
Dipankar Datta
Bench
Dipankar Datta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of restrictions imposed on the number of women joining the Judge Advocate General (JAG) branch under the Army Act, 1950. The court analyzed whether such restrictions violate the rights of women under constitutional provisions. It held that the notification permitting women to join the JAG branch under Section 12 of the Army Act is valid, and restrictions on their numbers are justified. The judgment emphasizes the importance of gender equality balanced with military discipline and operational requirements.

Arshnoor Kaur vs Union Of India · Niyam