Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-04-28

Gbj Hotels Private Limited vs Sriharan Sripathmanathan

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Gbj Hotels Private Limited
Respondent
Sriharan Sripathmanathan
Author
Dipankar Datta
Bench
Dipankar Datta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of an order passed by the High Court of Madras concerning the recovery of a debt of approximately Rs. 135 crore owed by respondents to Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited. The respondents challenged an order requiring them to deposit 50% of the debt under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, following an auction conducted as part of debt recovery proceedings. The Court analyzed the statutory provisions and the procedural aspects of debt recovery, ultimately upholding the order. The judgment clarifies the scope of judicial review in debt recovery cases under SARFAESI and affirms the authority of the recovery tribunal to impose such conditions.

Gbj Hotels Private Limited vs Sriharan Sripathmanathan · Niyam