Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-04-21

Sumitraben Singabhai Gamit vs The State Of Gujarat

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sumitraben Singabhai Gamit
Respondent
The State Of Gujarat
Author
Dipankar Datta
Bench
Dipankar Datta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of the correct date for determining the market value of land acquired under the RFCTLARR Act, 2013. The High Court had erroneously fixed the date as 1st January, 2014, the commencement date of the Act, instead of the date of issuance of the acquisition notification, as prescribed in Section 26(1) proviso. The Court clarified that the valuation date should be the date of notification, aligning with statutory provisions. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of correct valuation date for compensation.

Sumitraben Singabhai Gamit vs The State Of Gujarat · Niyam