Neha Chandrakant Shroff vs The State Of Maharashtra

The Supreme Court examined whether the State of Maharashtra's actions in not releasing and restoring possession of certain flats violated the petitioners' fundamental rights under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High Court had dismissed the writ petition, and the appellants challenged this decision. The Court analyzed the legality of the State's actions concerning property rights and procedural compliance. Ultimately, the Court upheld the High Court's judgment, emphasizing the importance of lawful procedures in property disputes.