Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-04-07

Hutu Ansari @ Futu Ansar vs The State Of Jharkhand

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Hutu Ansari @ Futu Ansar
Respondent
The State Of Jharkhand
Author
Sudhanshu Dhulia
Bench
Sudhanshu Dhulia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of criminal convictions under Sections 447 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The trial court convicted nine accused, and the High Court modified the sentences, ordering them to run concurrently. The Court analyzed whether the sentences imposed were proportionate and consistent with legal standards, ultimately upholding the modified sentences. The judgment emphasizes the importance of proportionality and adherence to statutory provisions in sentencing.

Hutu Ansari @ Futu Ansar vs The State Of Jharkhand · Niyam