Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Supreme Court of India · 2025-04-29

Punit Beriwala vs The State Of Nct Of Delhi

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Punit Beriwala
Respondent
The State Of Nct Of Delhi
Author
Dipankar Datta
Bench
Dipankar Datta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined whether the Delhi High Court was justified in quashing the FIR against respondents for offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, and 120B of the IPC. The Court analyzed the legal standards for quashing FIRs under Section 482 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the need for prima facie evidence of a cognizable offence. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming that the FIR did not prima facie establish the offences against the respondents. The judgment clarifies the scope of judicial review in quashing criminal proceedings at the initial stage.

Punit Beriwala vs The State Of Nct Of Delhi · Niyam