Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-09-24

Shyamsundar Radheshyam Agrawal vs Pushpabai Nilkanth Patil

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 730
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shyamsundar Radheshyam Agrawal
Respondent
Pushpabai Nilkanth Patil
Author
Pankaj Mithal
Bench
Pankaj Mithal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Bombay High Court affirming the trial Court's order to impound six agreements for sale under Sections 33, 34 & 37 of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, and Section 17 of the Registration Act. The Court found that the agreements included a clause transferring physical possession, necessitating stamp duty payment. The Court ruled that the appellants were liable for stamp duty and penalty on the impounded documents, rejecting their argument that prior agreements did not require stamping due to a subsequent registered sale deed.

Shyamsundar Radheshyam Agrawal vs Pushpabai Nilkanth Patil · Niyam