Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-11-22

K.S. Muralidhar vs R. Subbulakshmi

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 886
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
K.S. Muralidhar
Respondent
R. Subbulakshmi
Author
Sanjay Karol
Bench
Sanjay Karol, C.T. Ravikumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized the principle of 'restitutio ad integrum' in determining just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, highlighting that while compensation cannot restore a victim's life, it aims to alleviate their suffering. The Court upheld the Tribunal's finding of rash and negligent driving under Sections 279, 337, and 338 IPC, and confirmed the compensation amount of Rs.58,09,930/- with interest, excluding future medical expenses. The judgment reinforces the complexities in calculating non-pecuniary damages, acknowledging the profound impact of accidents on victims' lives.

K.S. Muralidhar vs R. Subbulakshmi · Niyam