Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-11-18

Gurmeet Singh And Ors. Etc vs The State Of Punjab

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 872
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Gurmeet Singh And Ors. Etc
Respondent
The State Of Punjab
Author
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Bench
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellants' intra-court appeals regarding benefits under the Proficiency Step-up Scheme, 1988, and Assured Career Progression Scheme, 1998, asserting that the differential treatment did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court found that the appellants were not entitled to count their work-charged service for the purpose of these benefits, as the State had extended such benefits only to those who met specific criteria. The judgment clarified that the appellants' claims were not supported by the relevant policy circulars and communications from the State.

Gurmeet Singh And Ors. Etc vs The State Of Punjab · Niyam