Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-11-05

Justice Shailendra Singh vs Union Of India

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 862
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Justice Shailendra Singh
Respondent
Union Of India
Author
Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud
Bench
Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of non-payment of terminal benefits to High Court judges due to the failure to open General Provident Fund accounts as mandated by Section 20 of the High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954. The Court emphasized that the provisions of the Constitution and the governing statute must be interpreted to ensure financial independence for judges. The Court held that the failure to provide these benefits violates the rights of the judges and directed the authorities to comply with the statutory requirements for the establishment of Provident Fund accounts.

Justice Shailendra Singh vs Union Of India · Niyam