Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-11-08

Central Organisation For Railway ... vs M/S Eci Spic Smo Mcml (Jv) A Joint Venture ...

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 857
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Central Organisation For Railway ...
Respondent
M/S Eci Spic Smo Mcml (Jv) A Joint Venture ...
Author
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Bench
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the principles underpinning the Arbitration Act, emphasizing the importance of party autonomy and the mandatory provisions therein. It held that the appointment of arbitrators must adhere to the principle of equality, as outlined in Section 18 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and that unilateral appointments violate this equality clause. The Court established that the nemo judex rule and the doctrine of bias are crucial in ensuring impartiality in arbitration proceedings, thereby reinforcing the need for independence and fairness in the arbitration process.

Central Organisation For Railway ... vs M/S Eci Spic Smo Mcml (Jv) A Joint Venture ... · Niyam