Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-11-07

Goqii Technologies Private Limited vs Sokrati Technologies Private Limited

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 853
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Goqii Technologies Private Limited
Respondent
Sokrati Technologies Private Limited
Author
Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud
Bench
Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal against the Bombay High Court's dismissal of Goqii Technologies' application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for the appointment of an arbitrator. The Court held that the existence of a valid arbitration agreement under Clause 18.12 of the Master Services Agreement was established, and the High Court's refusal to appoint an arbitrator was erroneous. The Court directed the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve the disputes arising from the agreement, thereby upholding the principles of arbitration as outlined in the Act, 1996.

Goqii Technologies Private Limited vs Sokrati Technologies Private Limited · Niyam