Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-05-14

Bhikchand S/O Dhondiram Mutha ... vs Shamabai Dhanraj Gugale (Deceased) ...

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 411
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bhikchand S/O Dhondiram Mutha ...
Respondent
Shamabai Dhanraj Gugale (Deceased) ...
Author
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Bench
Prashant Kumar Mishra, Hrishikesh Roy

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of restitution under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, following a variation of a decree by the appellate court. The court held that the judgment debtor is not entitled to restitution as the original decree was modified only regarding interest, and the debtor failed to deposit any amount post-decree execution. Consequently, the rejection of the restitution application by the lower courts was upheld, affirming the principle that restitution is contingent upon the debtor's compliance with the decree's terms.

Bhikchand S/O Dhondiram Mutha ... vs Shamabai Dhanraj Gugale (Deceased) ... · Niyam