Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-05-03

Kanihya @ Kanhi (D) Th:Lrs vs Sukhi Ram

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 374
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Kanihya @ Kanhi (D) Th:Lrs
Respondent
Sukhi Ram
Author
Rajesh Bindal
Bench
C.T. Ravikumar, Rajesh Bindal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of a review application allowed by the High Court, which recalled its earlier order permitting the appellants to deposit a deficit amount of ₹14 in a pre-emption suit. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements under the Civil Procedure Code, particularly regarding timely deposits as per court orders. The Court ultimately upheld the High Court's decision, dismissing the appeal and reinforcing the principle that procedural lapses can lead to dismissal of claims.

Kanihya @ Kanhi (D) Th:Lrs vs Sukhi Ram · Niyam