Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-05-01

Commissioner Of Trade And Taxes vs Femc Pratibha Joint Venture

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 364
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Trade And Taxes
Respondent
Femc Pratibha Joint Venture
Author
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Bench
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Aravind Kumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court's judgment quashing the adjustment order under Section 38(3) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004, which mandated strict adherence to timelines for processing refunds. The Court ruled that the department cannot retain refund amounts beyond the prescribed time limit and can only adjust refunds against enforceable tax demands. The Court affirmed that the adjustment order was not maintainable as the statutory timeline was not followed, thus directing the refund along with interest as per Section 42.

Commissioner Of Trade And Taxes vs Femc Pratibha Joint Venture · Niyam