Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-05-01

Vakil Ahmad vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Home ...

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 363
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vakil Ahmad
Respondent
The State Of Uttar Pradesh Home ...

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the adequacy of chargesheets under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, emphasizing that they must contain detailed facts and evidence rather than mere reproductions of FIRs. The Court reiterated the requirements outlined in its previous judgment in Dablu Kujur v. State of Jharkhand, mandating that chargesheets include specific information about the investigation and evidence. The Court held that failure to comply with these requirements undermines the integrity of the criminal justice process.

Vakil Ahmad vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Home ... · Niyam