Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-07-16

The State Of Meghalaya vs Lalrintluanga Sailo

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 537
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Meghalaya
Respondent
Lalrintluanga Sailo
Author
C.T. Ravikumar
Bench
Prashant Kumar Mishra, C.T. Ravikumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the State of Meghalaya's challenge to the High Court's bail order dated 29.09.2023 under Sections 21(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The Court emphasized that bail in cases involving commercial quantities of narcotics must satisfy the conditions under Section 37(1)(b)(ii), which requires the court to be satisfied that the accused is not guilty and unlikely to commit further offences. The Court ultimately held that the High Court's bail order was granted without proper consideration of these statutory requirements, necessitating intervention.

The State Of Meghalaya vs Lalrintluanga Sailo · Niyam