Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-01-30

SHATRUGHNA ATMARAM PATIL vs VINOD DODHU CHAUDHARY

Citation / case number
SC 2023/45672
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHATRUGHNA ATMARAM PATIL
Respondent
VINOD DODHU CHAUDHARY
Author
K.V. VISWANATHAN VIKRAM NATH
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the procedural issues surrounding the registration of FIRs under Section 306 IPC concerning the alleged abetment of suicide by tenants. The Court held that the Magistrate's order under Section 202 Cr.P.C. was improper as it limited the inquiry and did not direct the police to register an FIR, which is mandatory under Section 154 Cr.P.C. The Court upheld the Sessions Judge's order directing the registration of the FIR and investigation, affirming the High Court's decision to approve this order and issue further directions for investigation.

SHATRUGHNA ATMARAM PATIL vs VINOD DODHU CHAUDHARY · Niyam