Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-01-03

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH vs ASSOCIATION OF RETIRED SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURT JUDGES AT ALLAHABAD

Citation / case number
SC 2023/16613
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Respondent
ASSOCIATION OF RETIRED SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURT JUDGES AT ALLAHABAD
Author
THE CHIEF B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by directing the Uttar Pradesh Government to notify rules regarding domestic help for former judges, as this infringes on the separation of powers. The Court held that criminal contempt proceedings cannot be initiated against parties for seeking legal remedies or challenging orders, emphasizing the importance of judicial restraint. The Court quashed the High Court's orders, reinforcing that government officials should not be summoned for compliance with such directives.

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH vs ASSOCIATION OF RETIRED SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURT JUDGES AT ALLAHABAD · Niyam