Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-01-29

DIRECTOR GENERAL COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH (CSIR) vs J.K PRASHAR

Citation / case number
SC 2020/9652
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DIRECTOR GENERAL COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH (CSIR)
Respondent
J.K PRASHAR
Author
Mehta
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the promotions of respondents 2 and 3 to the post of Under Secretary violated the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research Administrative Services (Recruitment & Promotion) Rules, 1982, as they had not independently performed the duties of a Section Officer. The Court emphasized that eligibility for promotion must strictly adhere to the statutory rules, which require a minimum of eight years of approved service and formal appointment as Section Officer. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeals filed by the CSIR, affirming the High Court's ruling.

DIRECTOR GENERAL COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH (CSIR) vs J.K PRASHAR · Niyam