Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-01-03

MARY PUSHPAM vs TELVI CURUSUMARY AND ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 2009/31338
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MARY PUSHPAM
Respondent
TELVI CURUSUMARY AND ORS.
Author
VIKRAM NATH
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of 'Judicial Discipline and Propriety' and the Doctrine of Precedents, asserting that decisions of coordinate benches must be respected unless referred to a larger bench. The Court upheld the Trial Court's decree for declaration of title, possession, and permanent injunction, confirming that the earlier dismissal of the respondents' ejectment suit was final and binding. The Court ruled that the appellant's possession was legitimate and protected under the law, thereby restoring the Trial Court's judgment.

MARY PUSHPAM vs TELVI CURUSUMARY AND ORS. · Niyam