Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-01-17

Pramila vs The State Of Chhattisgarh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Pramila
Respondent
The State Of Chhattisgarh
Author
Abhay S. Oka
Bench
Abhay S.Oka

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the appellant, convicted under Sections 302 and 201 IPC, was a juvenile at the time of the offence, as per the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986. The Court found that the appellant's age was less than 18 years on the date of the incident, thus necessitating treatment under Section 21 of the 1986 JJ Act, which prohibits imprisonment for juveniles. Consequently, the Court quashed the prior convictions and sentences, allowing the appeal and cancelling the bail bonds.

Pramila vs The State Of Chhattisgarh · Niyam